Notes on Political and Economic Reform


Ted Bagg


Here's my sense of what's wrong and a general idea of what I think we (the public) should do.

Maybe I'll get around to developing these ideas; but 'til then, here they are.


The U.S. Democratic Party leadership's one-front-at-a-time political strategy is fundamentally wrong, as centuries of military history teach and decades of right-wing political successes illustrate. If Sun-Tzu and Liddell-Hart were alive today, they'd likely shake their heads at the refusal to impeach before the the election or prosecute afterward, the focus on a single legislative priority at a time, or the tame submission to a media industry dominated by propagandists for the opposing party. This is so glaringly obvious that the Democratic strategy is probably an instance of deliberate sabotage by the leadership. (The recent pressure on Fox by the White House is a hopeful sign that maybe someone's catching on.)

Two heads are better than one, and many heads are better than just a few. Democracy works better than oligarchy.

Most politically-conscious people feel a revolutionary nimbus building up. How do we direct it effectually so as to overcome the “National Security” state and institute democracy and good government? (Can we, like, skip the chaotic violence and cut to the part where things get better?) The Okhrana's heirs (Охрана) and their feudal masters have more than a century (maybe much more) of experience to guide their attempts to co-opt and dissipate this charge without losing their grip.

History shows that unaccountable power will inevitably be abused and is thus inherently criminal. Consequently, so are large private accumulations of wealth, likewise all official secrecy. Moreover, capital concentration must be constrained to prevent convergence toward monopoly and catastrophic failure. A market dominated by just a few players cannot allocate resources fairly, as the dominant few collude to oppress everyone else.

Structural Reforms:

Policy Reforms: